I am honored to have been chosen as a presenter at this year’s NAET International Symposium to be held this summer! I’m excited to share with others the truly life-changing results I’ve seen NAET produce in some of my patients. For those who are unfamiliar, NAET is a holistic treatment that is used to eliminate allergies of all types–even allergies so severe that they are life threatening. I’d first like to share with you this video which NAET and Fox News have teamed together to produce. It explains how nutritional therapy may have the power to treat Autism.
I’d also like to share with you an excerpt from my presentation for the NAET International Symposium. I describe two unique cases of mysterious allergies and how I treated each of them with NAET. As always, if you have any questions or can relate to any of the stories I share below, please do not hesitate to contact me or my staff at Naturally Balanced!
The Case of the Hidden Allergen: The Sherlock Holmes Method of NAET
How many of you have read Sherlock Holmes written by Arthur Conan Doyle? I’m a big fan of mysteries and I love Sherlock Holmes. Upon reading him recently I noticed that Holmes’ methods of solving mysteries are much like our methods of doing NAET. So I’d like to explore ways that we can improve our skills using Sherlock Holmes’ methods.
Sherlock Holmes in his original meeting with Dr. John Watson asks “How are you? You have been in Afghanistan I perceive.”
How on earth did you know that? Watson demands.
“I have a kind of intuition that way. You see I have a lot of specialized knowledge which I apply to the problem, and which facilitates me wonderfully. Observation to me is second nature. From long habit the train of thoughts ran so swiftly through my mind that I arrived at the conclusion without being conscious of intermediate steps. The train of reasoning ran, “’Here is a gentleman of the medical type, but with the air of a military man. Clearly an army doctor. He has just returned from the tropics, for his face is dark, and that is not the natural tint of his skin, for his wrists are fair. He has undergone hardship and sickness, as his haggard face says clearly. His left arm has been injured. He holds it in a stiff and unnatural manner. Where in the tropics could an English army doctor have seen much hardship and got his arm wounded? Clearly in Afghanistan. The whole train of thought did not occupy a second.’”
Sherlock Holmes told Watson in a later case, “You must separate the essential from the accidental.” How many of you when you first started practicing NAET just went kit to kit muscle testing each vial? I did. And did we get results? Sure. At least I did. It’s a great technique and a great method for most cases. But when we have an extremely sick patient, or one facing aggressive medical intervention, or one suffering for a long time from an illness we need to utilize all our tools and skills to get maximum results to protect them from the illness itself. We need an intervention. We have the methods of NAET, with its inherent rules like basics first, extended basics next etc. We will look at several cases in this talk. In each one it was important that I get to the essential allergens quickly. For critical cases, we must find the essential vials quickly while still remaining within the rules of NAET.
So we are going to begin with a mystery that I will ask you to help me solve: The Case of the Hidden Allergen.
On May 1, 2009, Mrs. Crystal, a young and attractive woman came to the office. She was carrying her young baby; appearing to be approximately four or five months old, in a car seat. She was thin, yet with a flattering busty figure, with long brown hair pulled back in a ponytail. She wore blue jeans, sneakers, and a sleeveless cotton top. She had a large diamond ring and a simple wedding band on the fourth finger of her left hand. The child, despite the warmth of the weather was wearing tights, a long sleeved pajamas, socks on his hands, and a hat pulled nearly down to his eyes. In fact, only his little face shined up at me. Instantly I took in the fiery red, seeping sores of eczema on his little cheeks and chin. What can I deduce thus far using Sherlock Holmes’ rules that observation is second nature, and that I have a lot of specialized knowledge which I can apply to the problem?
I deduced Based on this/these observation
The child is the patient. I recognize a severe case of eczema
He’s a very sick baby. Severe eczema is an immune problem.
He looks to be about 4- 5 months old. He is not yet sitting up in his car carrier
The mother does not work outside the home. She is wearing jeans, sneakers and a ponytail.
The child scratches his skin. He’s wearing socks on his hands to keep from scratching.
The family has money. Her rings and the fact that she stays at home
The child is breast fed. Her slim, yet busty figure.
They’ve been to three previous doctors. I am the 4th doctor most of my new patients have seen.
It will be a difficult case. If it were easy the first three doctors would have solved it.
The history of the child per the Mother:
Mrs. Crystal was a teacher who had to quit work because of early effacing of her cervix. Silas was born at 36 weeks and was delivered by an emergency C-section. He spent one week in NICU. He couldn’t breastfeed initially so his first food was formula through his nose. Shortly after that she pumped breast milk. He weighed 6 pounds when he was released and was nursing. At about 6 weeks old the mother noticed red spots on his face and head. Her mother told her that it was cradle cap and recommended scrubbing it. It got worse, not better. The pediatrician diagnosed baby acne and eczema. At about 8 weeks it covered every inch of his head, his arms and legs, and back. A dermatologist she was referred to gave her some medicine. When she read the insert, it said: “immune blocker; do not use on children under two years old. This medicine is linked to cancer.” The mother threw the medicine away and began an Internet search. She purchased organic lotions and ointments and other topical products which she used to no avail. She returned to her pediatrician and he did food allergy testing. Some allergies were revealed and Mrs. Crystal removed those foods from her diet. Silas seemed to improve in the short run, however when he became worse he was retested and found to be allergic to be even more foods. His skin broke open and bled. Now the mom avoided even more foods. In his blood work of February 15, 2009 his platelets were 817 (244-496 is normal) and he had IGE antibodies to many foods and environmental allergens. She was referred to a pediatric, hematological oncologist. She also went to another medical facility and “didn’t feel like she got a good explanation from the MD. He wanted to fix me because the breast milk came from me”.
When we review what we deduced we find that nearly all of it was correct except that the child is 7 months old and therefore slightly delayed developmentally.
Also she has been to 4 other doctors before me so I now know I have an even more unusual case.
So where do you think I began with this baby? If you guessed the Basics, you were partly correct. But guess what? I couldn’t get him through ANY BASICS after BBF because when he was exposed to the vial directly OR with a surrogate he broke out in hives and screamed and cried as if in pain. SO look back through the history and tell me. What is the hidden allergen that we must clear?
What is unusual about this case? This child has never been given food, yet he shows IgE antibodies to foods in his blood work. He cannot even touch vials containing the energy of nutrients. The only possible exposure to foods came from breast milk. So where did I begin in this case? With breast milk. I had the mother come into my office and pump breast milk. I encouraged her to eat different foods prior to coming to the office so that her milk was different each day. I hoped that this would desensitize his immune system in minute increments. We treated many, many times over two years. In June 2011 the platelets were 493 (decreased by half and within normal range) and many of the food IgE antibodies had decreased. So it was an effective treatment plan.
This patient had a mother who was a wonderful partner with me in her child’s treatment. My powers of observation were helpful, but not critical. Our powers of observation become critical when a patient has a difficult time articulating their history or interceding for themselves due to their emotional issues. Since I began doing emotional treatments, I’ve become much like a religious convert who is a fanatic! Humans are physical and emotional beings and to treat the whole patient, we need to look at emotions and their impact on the physical body, and the reverse.
Let’s look at on more hidden allergy case.
Herm Jones, a 73 year old male was referred to me because of back pain. I knew he had seen four previous doctors because I had been told by the patient who referred him. He showed up for his first visit and I noticed a white haired man with a rugged, tanned face and a fit body. While in my waiting room he struck up a conversation with Alex, the patient I shared with Dr. Devi. I heard them talking but didn’t hear the conversation. In the history from the patient I learned that his back had been painful for five months. He had been a marathon runner for many years but quit 11 years ago “when my wife left me for a younger man”. In the past five months he had not been running at all. When I asked him when he had stopped running I had a difficult time getting an answer. So I went back holiday by holiday asking him” were you running at Thanksgiving”? and so on. When I got to Labor Day at the end of August he was running. In September he wasn’t running. I asked why he was running in August and not in September. He said because he was getting older. I said incredulously “you got older between August and September?”
After much prompting and repeated questions about what changed in his life in September I learned that his wife had gotten engaged. What is the hidden allergen in Herm’s case? I muscle tested and found “depressed”. The short version of his care was that I told Herm if I didn’t look at the depression in relation to his back pain that I would be like all the other doctors who treated him and failed. When Alex (the other patient) returned a week later he said” that in the first 30 seconds of our conversation, that guy Herm told me his wife left him for younger man 11 years ago. He obviously has emotional issues and he’s in the right place.”
How can we develop specialized knowledge? Study and learn. If you’d like to learn the tools I use, I’ll have my contact information at the end. Take the acupuncture licensing Dr. Devi insists upon. Come to NAET advanced seminars. LEARN MORE. I once asked my father, a fabulous Chiropractor for 50 years for a cheat sheet way to get answers on a patient. His response was “you’re not going to like my answer because it’s everything you’ve ever learned, along with gut feeling and instinct, which improves with experience.”
How many of you have had patients who had a difficult time articulating their history, and interceding for themselves, and who would have taken the medicine that was prescribed without reading the warning labels, or given it to their child? We need to be the best that we can possibly be for those patients. If the child in this paper had not been treated, he could have continued to be delayed developmentally. He was only a couple months behind at this early stage, and it’s easy to catch a baby up a month or two. But he could have been years behind if no intervention had been taken. Or he could have developed leukemia if his immune system was not turned around. We truly have people’s lives in our hands. We can’t ever prove what DIDN’T HAPPEN, or in other words, what we prevented. But that is where the magic is in NAET.








